Hacked By AnonymousFox
dnl
dnl Based on https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf-archive/ax_cxx_compile_stdcxx.html
dnl Author: Anatol Belski <ab@php.net>
dnl
dnl PHP_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX(version, mandatory|optional, var_name_to_put_switch_in)
dnl
dnl ARGUMENTS
dnl
dnl first arg - version as 11, 14, 17 or 20
dnl second arg - if mandatory, the configure will fail when no features found.
dnl Optional will make configure silently continue
dnl third arg - a variable name where the corresponding switch would be put. If
dnl the variable is already defined, its contents will be overwritten.
dnl
dnl EXAMPLE
dnl
dnl PHP_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX(14, mandatory, MY_STDCXX_SWiTCH)
dnl echo $MY_STDCXX_SWITCH
dnl
dnl
dnl PHP specific implementation start.
dnl
AC_DEFUN([PHP_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX], [dnl
m4_if([$1], [11], [ax_cxx_compile_alternatives="11 0x"],
[$1], [14], [ax_cxx_compile_alternatives="14 1y"],
[$1], [17], [ax_cxx_compile_alternatives="17 1z"],
[$1], [20], [ax_cxx_compile_alternatives="20"],
[m4_fatal([invalid first argument `$1' to PHP_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX])])[]dnl
m4_if([$2], [], [ax_cxx_compile_cxx$1_required=true],
[$2], [mandatory], [ax_cxx_compile_cxx$1_required=true],
[$2], [optional], [ax_cxx_compile_cxx$1_required=false],
[m4_fatal([invalid third argument `$2' to PHP_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX])])[]dnl
AC_LANG_PUSH([C++])dnl
ac_success=no
dnl HP's aCC needs +std=c++11 according to:
dnl http://h21007.www2.hp.com/portal/download/files/unprot/aCxx/PDF_Release_Notes/769149-001.pdf
dnl Cray's crayCC needs "-h std=c++11"
for alternative in ${ax_cxx_compile_alternatives}; do
for switch in -std=c++${alternative} +std=c++${alternative} "-h std=c++${alternative}"; do
cachevar=AS_TR_SH([ax_cv_cxx_compile_cxx$1_$switch])
AC_CACHE_CHECK(whether $CXX supports C++$1 features with $switch,
$cachevar,
[ac_save_CXX="$CXX"
CXX="$CXX $switch"
AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_$1])],
[eval $cachevar=yes],
[eval $cachevar=no])
CXX="$ac_save_CXX"])
if eval test x\$$cachevar = xyes; then
eval AS_TR_SH([$3])="$switch"
ac_success=yes
break
fi
done
if test x$ac_success = xyes; then
break
fi
done
AC_LANG_POP([C++])
if test x$ax_cxx_compile_cxx$1_required = xtrue; then
if test x$ac_success = xno; then
AC_MSG_ERROR([*** A compiler with support for C++$1 language features is required.])
fi
fi
if test x$ac_success = xno; then
AC_MSG_NOTICE([No compiler with C++$1 support was found])
fi
AC_SUBST(HAVE_CXX$1)
])
dnl
dnl PHP specific implementation end.
dnl The relevant part of the unchanged original implementation is below.
dnl
#
# LICENSE
#
# Copyright (c) 2008 Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
# Copyright (c) 2012 Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>
# Copyright (c) 2013 Roy Stogner <roystgnr@ices.utexas.edu>
# Copyright (c) 2014, 2015 Google Inc.; contributed by Alexey Sokolov <sokolov@google.com>
# Copyright (c) 2015 Paul Norman <penorman@mac.com>
# Copyright (c) 2015 Moritz Klammler <moritz@klammler.eu>
# Copyright (c) 2016, 2018 Krzesimir Nowak <qdlacz@gmail.com>
# Copyright (c) 2019 Enji Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>
# Copyright (c) 2020 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
# Copyright (c) 2021 Jörn Heusipp <osmanx@problemloesungsmaschine.de>
#
# Copying and distribution of this file, with or without modification, are
# permitted in any medium without royalty provided the copyright notice
# and this notice are preserved. This file is offered as-is, without any
# warranty.
dnl Test body for checking C++11 support
m4_define([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_11],
_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_11
)
dnl Test body for checking C++14 support
m4_define([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_14],
_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_11
_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_14
)
dnl Test body for checking C++17 support
m4_define([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_17],
_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_11
_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_14
_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_17
)
dnl Test body for checking C++20 support
m4_define([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_20],
_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_11
_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_14
_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_17
_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_20
)
dnl Tests for new features in C++11
m4_define([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_11], [[
// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++11, why torture it?
// Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
#ifndef __cplusplus
#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
#elif __cplusplus < 201103L
#error "This is not a C++11 compiler"
#else
namespace cxx11
{
namespace test_static_assert
{
template <typename T>
struct check
{
static_assert(sizeof(int) <= sizeof(T), "not big enough");
};
}
namespace test_final_override
{
struct Base
{
virtual ~Base() {}
virtual void f() {}
};
struct Derived : public Base
{
virtual ~Derived() override {}
virtual void f() override {}
};
}
namespace test_double_right_angle_brackets
{
template < typename T >
struct check {};
typedef check<void> single_type;
typedef check<check<void>> double_type;
typedef check<check<check<void>>> triple_type;
typedef check<check<check<check<void>>>> quadruple_type;
}
namespace test_decltype
{
int
f()
{
int a = 1;
decltype(a) b = 2;
return a + b;
}
}
namespace test_type_deduction
{
template < typename T1, typename T2 >
struct is_same
{
static const bool value = false;
};
template < typename T >
struct is_same<T, T>
{
static const bool value = true;
};
template < typename T1, typename T2 >
auto
add(T1 a1, T2 a2) -> decltype(a1 + a2)
{
return a1 + a2;
}
int
test(const int c, volatile int v)
{
static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(0)>::value == true, "");
static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(c)>::value == false, "");
static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(v)>::value == false, "");
auto ac = c;
auto av = v;
auto sumi = ac + av + 'x';
auto sumf = ac + av + 1.0;
static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(ac)>::value == true, "");
static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(av)>::value == true, "");
static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(sumi)>::value == true, "");
static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(sumf)>::value == false, "");
static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(add(c, v))>::value == true, "");
return (sumf > 0.0) ? sumi : add(c, v);
}
}
namespace test_noexcept
{
int f() { return 0; }
int g() noexcept { return 0; }
static_assert(noexcept(f()) == false, "");
static_assert(noexcept(g()) == true, "");
}
namespace test_constexpr
{
template < typename CharT >
unsigned long constexpr
strlen_c_r(const CharT *const s, const unsigned long acc) noexcept
{
return *s ? strlen_c_r(s + 1, acc + 1) : acc;
}
template < typename CharT >
unsigned long constexpr
strlen_c(const CharT *const s) noexcept
{
return strlen_c_r(s, 0UL);
}
static_assert(strlen_c("") == 0UL, "");
static_assert(strlen_c("1") == 1UL, "");
static_assert(strlen_c("example") == 7UL, "");
static_assert(strlen_c("another\0example") == 7UL, "");
}
namespace test_rvalue_references
{
template < int N >
struct answer
{
static constexpr int value = N;
};
answer<1> f(int&) { return answer<1>(); }
answer<2> f(const int&) { return answer<2>(); }
answer<3> f(int&&) { return answer<3>(); }
void
test()
{
int i = 0;
const int c = 0;
static_assert(decltype(f(i))::value == 1, "");
static_assert(decltype(f(c))::value == 2, "");
static_assert(decltype(f(0))::value == 3, "");
}
}
namespace test_uniform_initialization
{
struct test
{
static const int zero {};
static const int one {1};
};
static_assert(test::zero == 0, "");
static_assert(test::one == 1, "");
}
namespace test_lambdas
{
void
test1()
{
auto lambda1 = [](){};
auto lambda2 = lambda1;
lambda1();
lambda2();
}
int
test2()
{
auto a = [](int i, int j){ return i + j; }(1, 2);
auto b = []() -> int { return '0'; }();
auto c = [=](){ return a + b; }();
auto d = [&](){ return c; }();
auto e = [a, &b](int x) mutable {
const auto identity = [](int y){ return y; };
for (auto i = 0; i < a; ++i)
a += b--;
return x + identity(a + b);
}(0);
return a + b + c + d + e;
}
int
test3()
{
const auto nullary = [](){ return 0; };
const auto unary = [](int x){ return x; };
using nullary_t = decltype(nullary);
using unary_t = decltype(unary);
const auto higher1st = [](nullary_t f){ return f(); };
const auto higher2nd = [unary](nullary_t f1){
return [unary, f1](unary_t f2){ return f2(unary(f1())); };
};
return higher1st(nullary) + higher2nd(nullary)(unary);
}
}
namespace test_variadic_templates
{
template <int...>
struct sum;
template <int N0, int... N1toN>
struct sum<N0, N1toN...>
{
static constexpr auto value = N0 + sum<N1toN...>::value;
};
template <>
struct sum<>
{
static constexpr auto value = 0;
};
static_assert(sum<>::value == 0, "");
static_assert(sum<1>::value == 1, "");
static_assert(sum<23>::value == 23, "");
static_assert(sum<1, 2>::value == 3, "");
static_assert(sum<5, 5, 11>::value == 21, "");
static_assert(sum<2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13>::value == 41, "");
}
// http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13728184/template-aliases-and-sfinae
// Clang 3.1 fails with headers of libstd++ 4.8.3 when using std::function
// because of this.
namespace test_template_alias_sfinae
{
struct foo {};
template<typename T>
using member = typename T::member_type;
template<typename T>
void func(...) {}
template<typename T>
void func(member<T>*) {}
void test();
void test() { func<foo>(0); }
}
} // namespace cxx11
#endif // __cplusplus >= 201103L
]])
dnl Tests for new features in C++14
m4_define([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_14], [[
// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++14, why torture it?
// Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
#ifndef __cplusplus
#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
#elif __cplusplus < 201402L
#error "This is not a C++14 compiler"
#else
namespace cxx14
{
namespace test_polymorphic_lambdas
{
int
test()
{
const auto lambda = [](auto&&... args){
const auto istiny = [](auto x){
return (sizeof(x) == 1UL) ? 1 : 0;
};
const int aretiny[] = { istiny(args)... };
return aretiny[0];
};
return lambda(1, 1L, 1.0f, '1');
}
}
namespace test_binary_literals
{
constexpr auto ivii = 0b0000000000101010;
static_assert(ivii == 42, "wrong value");
}
namespace test_generalized_constexpr
{
template < typename CharT >
constexpr unsigned long
strlen_c(const CharT *const s) noexcept
{
auto length = 0UL;
for (auto p = s; *p; ++p)
++length;
return length;
}
static_assert(strlen_c("") == 0UL, "");
static_assert(strlen_c("x") == 1UL, "");
static_assert(strlen_c("test") == 4UL, "");
static_assert(strlen_c("another\0test") == 7UL, "");
}
namespace test_lambda_init_capture
{
int
test()
{
auto x = 0;
const auto lambda1 = [a = x](int b){ return a + b; };
const auto lambda2 = [a = lambda1(x)](){ return a; };
return lambda2();
}
}
namespace test_digit_separators
{
constexpr auto ten_million = 100'000'000;
static_assert(ten_million == 100000000, "");
}
namespace test_return_type_deduction
{
auto f(int& x) { return x; }
decltype(auto) g(int& x) { return x; }
template < typename T1, typename T2 >
struct is_same
{
static constexpr auto value = false;
};
template < typename T >
struct is_same<T, T>
{
static constexpr auto value = true;
};
int
test()
{
auto x = 0;
static_assert(is_same<int, decltype(f(x))>::value, "");
static_assert(is_same<int&, decltype(g(x))>::value, "");
return x;
}
}
} // namespace cxx14
#endif // __cplusplus >= 201402L
]])
dnl Tests for new features in C++17
m4_define([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_17], [[
// If the compiler admits that it is not ready for C++17, why torture it?
// Hopefully, this will speed up the test.
#ifndef __cplusplus
#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
#elif __cplusplus < 201703L
#error "This is not a C++17 compiler"
#else
#include <initializer_list>
#include <utility>
#include <type_traits>
namespace cxx17
{
namespace test_constexpr_lambdas
{
constexpr int foo = [](){return 42;}();
}
namespace test::nested_namespace::definitions
{
}
namespace test_fold_expression
{
template<typename... Args>
int multiply(Args... args)
{
return (args * ... * 1);
}
template<typename... Args>
bool all(Args... args)
{
return (args && ...);
}
}
namespace test_extended_static_assert
{
static_assert (true);
}
namespace test_auto_brace_init_list
{
auto foo = {5};
auto bar {5};
static_assert(std::is_same<std::initializer_list<int>, decltype(foo)>::value);
static_assert(std::is_same<int, decltype(bar)>::value);
}
namespace test_typename_in_template_template_parameter
{
template<template<typename> typename X> struct D;
}
namespace test_fallthrough_nodiscard_maybe_unused_attributes
{
int f1()
{
return 42;
}
[[nodiscard]] int f2()
{
[[maybe_unused]] auto unused = f1();
switch (f1())
{
case 17:
f1();
[[fallthrough]];
case 42:
f1();
}
return f1();
}
}
namespace test_extended_aggregate_initialization
{
struct base1
{
int b1, b2 = 42;
};
struct base2
{
base2() {
b3 = 42;
}
int b3;
};
struct derived : base1, base2
{
int d;
};
derived d1 {{1, 2}, {}, 4}; // full initialization
derived d2 {{}, {}, 4}; // value-initialized bases
}
namespace test_general_range_based_for_loop
{
struct iter
{
int i;
int& operator* ()
{
return i;
}
const int& operator* () const
{
return i;
}
iter& operator++()
{
++i;
return *this;
}
};
struct sentinel
{
int i;
};
bool operator== (const iter& i, const sentinel& s)
{
return i.i == s.i;
}
bool operator!= (const iter& i, const sentinel& s)
{
return !(i == s);
}
struct range
{
iter begin() const
{
return {0};
}
sentinel end() const
{
return {5};
}
};
void f()
{
range r {};
for (auto i : r)
{
[[maybe_unused]] auto v = i;
}
}
}
namespace test_lambda_capture_asterisk_this_by_value
{
struct t
{
int i;
int foo()
{
return [*this]()
{
return i;
}();
}
};
}
namespace test_enum_class_construction
{
enum class byte : unsigned char
{};
byte foo {42};
}
namespace test_constexpr_if
{
template <bool cond>
int f ()
{
if constexpr(cond)
{
return 13;
}
else
{
return 42;
}
}
}
namespace test_selection_statement_with_initializer
{
int f()
{
return 13;
}
int f2()
{
if (auto i = f(); i > 0)
{
return 3;
}
switch (auto i = f(); i + 4)
{
case 17:
return 2;
default:
return 1;
}
}
}
namespace test_template_argument_deduction_for_class_templates
{
template <typename T1, typename T2>
struct pair
{
pair (T1 p1, T2 p2)
: m1 {p1},
m2 {p2}
{}
T1 m1;
T2 m2;
};
void f()
{
[[maybe_unused]] auto p = pair{13, 42u};
}
}
namespace test_non_type_auto_template_parameters
{
template <auto n>
struct B
{};
B<5> b1;
B<'a'> b2;
}
namespace test_structured_bindings
{
int arr[2] = { 1, 2 };
std::pair<int, int> pr = { 1, 2 };
auto f1() -> int(&)[2]
{
return arr;
}
auto f2() -> std::pair<int, int>&
{
return pr;
}
struct S
{
int x1 : 2;
volatile double y1;
};
S f3()
{
return {};
}
auto [ x1, y1 ] = f1();
auto& [ xr1, yr1 ] = f1();
auto [ x2, y2 ] = f2();
auto& [ xr2, yr2 ] = f2();
const auto [ x3, y3 ] = f3();
}
namespace test_exception_spec_type_system
{
struct Good {};
struct Bad {};
void g1() noexcept;
void g2();
template<typename T>
Bad
f(T*, T*);
template<typename T1, typename T2>
Good
f(T1*, T2*);
static_assert (std::is_same_v<Good, decltype(f(g1, g2))>);
}
namespace test_inline_variables
{
template<class T> void f(T)
{}
template<class T> inline T g(T)
{
return T{};
}
template<> inline void f<>(int)
{}
template<> int g<>(int)
{
return 5;
}
}
} // namespace cxx17
#endif // __cplusplus < 201703L
]])
dnl Tests for new features in C++20
m4_define([_AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_testbody_new_in_20], [[
#ifndef __cplusplus
#error "This is not a C++ compiler"
#elif __cplusplus < 202002L
#error "This is not a C++20 compiler"
#else
#include <version>
namespace cxx20
{
// As C++20 supports feature test macros in the standard, there is no
// immediate need to actually test for feature availability on the
// Autoconf side.
} // namespace cxx20
#endif // __cplusplus < 202002L
]])
Hacked By AnonymousFox1.0, Coded By AnonymousFox